BMPCC 6K Review & Footage – Five Reasons to Like the Pocket 6K

The new Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 6K has already started to ship (although it’s not so clear in what quantities), but based on the excitement and interest in this camera, it was important for us to put it through its paces as quickly as possible. In our previous article and video I’ve already highlighted the similarity and differences between the new camera and its sibling, the BMPCC 4K, and now it was about time to go out and create some nice images with it. 

BMPCC 6K camera

Blackmagic Design was proud to release a “Pocket” camera with an APS-C sensor and a Canon EF mount. Are those two reasons enough to make one buy the new camera? From the feedback we have been getting from our audience, the answer is apparently yes! Combining robust acquisition codec(s) with an attractive price makes people “forgive” some lacking features that would be useful. It has been a while since I shot with the older Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 4K and being out and about with the new 6K version reminded me of what I liked when first filming with the Pocket 4K. I was also reminded why for me as a documentary filmmaker, it’s a mixed bag in many ways. But first things first, so let’s start on all the positive notes, and there are quite a few.

BMPCC 6K – Five Reasons to Love it

1- Picture quality: Let me start with the obvious: Blackmagic has proven again that one of the main advantages of their cameras (including the new Ursa Mini G2 and the BMPCC 6K) is its color science. The picture looks organic, “film-like” and has its own identity. Now with the addition of 6K, this is even more noticeable. The footage coming out of this camera is simply beautiful! 2- Recording Codecs: Blackmagic Design is the ONLY manufacturer who gives the filmmaking community a budget tool to record with proper codecs internally. If there is anything I’m learning to dislike in our industry it’s H264/H265 and external recorders. Both are highly hyped and could be completely avoided if manufacturers took the initiative to do so, because alternatives exist. By the way, licensing ProRes is free (yet needs Apple’s approval) and I have yet to understand what makes the camera makers stick with H264/H265 when the possibility to improve is there. (I’m not referring to ProRes RAW, where things gets a bit more complicated due to RED’s patents on some elements related to the encoding process.) Adding a robust recording codec will instantly save us money, will make us carry less accessories, and on top, will allow much faster and smoother editing. Blackmagic Design went a step further and in this camera (like in the BMPCC 4K) included their newly developed Blackmagic RAW codec. 3- Camera Operating System: I already mentioned it in previous posts and will continue to advocate it whenever possible: Blackmagic Design offers the best camera operating system I came across in recent times. It’s easy to understand, it’s logical to operate and there is no need to dive into ocean of pages and sub pages to find what you are looking for. 3- Resolution and Frame Rates: Personally, I think that the resolution race is a bit unnecessary, but in this price range, let it be. I’m one of those who is happy to have good internal 4K material. For now, recorded file sizes, overall picture quality and delivery (who has a TV with more than 4K resolution??) make absolute sense in 4K, especially if you are a documentary filmmaker like me. (As opposed to SFX professionals who might appreciate the higher resolution). HOWEVER, having said that, recording at a resolution greater than 4K can result in having a better 4K master – so in this case, the 6K (and it is beautiful!), might be a useful thing to have. With regards to frame rates, it is nice to see that the camera allows for a lot of flexibility in order to unleash creativity to its full potential or help with potential client requests. 4- Choice of Recording Media: This is one of my favourites: This camera (Like the BMPCC 4K), allows internal recording to SD and CFast cards, or externally to SSD. Indeed not all the mentioned recording media options bare the same recording possibilities and some impose limitations when attempting to film at higher frame rates. Nevertheless, having this flexibility of course helps with accommodating different needs and budgets. (Don’t forget that using the SSD option will eat the internal battery even faster – but more on battery life further down.) 5- Price: When it comes to value for money, this new camera gives an excellent fight to even more expensive cameras.

BMPCC 6K – Four Reasons to Doubt it

1- Cinema camera? I’ve deliberately chosen to start with this point. Ask 5 people what a “cinema camera” is and I bet you will be getting 10 different answers. In all honesty, I couldn’t care less about the word “cinema” in the camera title (The same goes for “Pocket”)…. If it does what it supposed to do and does it well, BRAVO! The way I look at it, the word “cinema” allows Blackmagic Design to elegantly avoid the subject of much necessary features like continuous autofocus and internal stabilisation altogether. (Maybe they would say, “It’s a cinema camera Johnnie, so why are you whining about those missing features ….”)

Nice resolution and sharp, but not good in direct sunlight: the LCD screen.

2- Big fixed LCD screen: The ones who are following my filmmaking work and article writing know that I’m already with one leg in the grave, meaning, the hair that once used to be on my head is now happily growing on my shoulders.  So how is this connected to the camera’s LCD screen? Well, as an old fashioned guy, give me a good EVF instead of a huge LCD and make me happy! This screen, as much as it is good for indoor menu navigation, is a complete nightmare to operate outdoors in bright sunlight. I wish Blackmagic Design would have considered making a “Cinema Pocket EVF”. An accessory that can easily be connected to this camera, maybe when being powered externally, so power consumption isn’t becoming even worse.

A necessity for me: a proper EVF on the camera.

3- Autofocus and In-Body Stabilisation System:  Yes, I mentioned it before, now it deserves its own dedicated few lines. Our production world is constantly changing and what was great before might not be good enough anymore. Good autofocus and in-body stabilisation systems are now far from being a luxury. They are becoming a necessity! The BMPCC 6K body size “shouts” mobility, so improvement is needed to make it truly portable. I’ll dare taking it a step farther and write that during my current shoot (just like with the BMPCC 4K before), I felt that I’m compromising on some of my shots and skipping what I really wanted to do, because the camera couldn’t do some of the things I needed it to do. In other words, I was working for the camera instead of it working for me, and it was always related to lacking continuous autofocus and the non-existent in-body stabiliser. This has NOTHING to do with its ability to produce beautiful images or shine when a certain shooting style is being implemented. It is about feeling limited when greater usability is needed (and offered by cameras competing at a similar size, for example the FUJIFILM X-T3.) 4- Camera Mount: For me, the choice of camera mount is odd and brilliant at the same time: Brilliant, because Blackmagic Design has experience with this mount from earlier on (URSA Mini), and for some of us, the EF mount offers the opportunity to use widely available lenses. On the other hand, it’s also an odd choice because this mount is completely outdated, even to the point that Canon themselves deserted it already by introducing the RF Mount for their mirrorless cameras. Not only that: As Canon stopped delivering mirrorless cameras that are appealing to many filmmakers (cameras that don’t compromise on good quality video), many of us moved on, sold our Canon equipment and invested in Sony, FUJIFILM or Panasonic. A modern short flange lens mount would have allowed users to easily adapt many of the (EF) lenses we already (or still) have, or, in some cases, even use a Metabones Speed Booster to get an even wider field-of-view, which would give this camera with an APS-C sensor full-frame image aesthetics.

6K Frame Grab – click for full 6K resolution image

BMPCC 6K – In the Field

High temperatures, light rain, dust, kids and horses. Facing it all, the camera performed very well! Additionally, no sign of overheating was spotted. The redesigned ventilation chamber proved to do a good job. Now, regarding resolution, frame rates and compression method, I decided to use Blackmagic RAW, 6K 2.4:1 .(6144×2560) resolution at 25p frame rate. (Constant bitrate was set on 5:1.) For slow-motion (120fps), I chose to film in 2.8K 17:9, 2868×1512. In order to get the cleanest possible image I took advantage of the dual ISO functionality of the camera and used ISO 400 for the outdoor shots and 3200 for indoor. A side note: The camera can record at a higher resolution (6144×3456), at a better compression (3:1) and even at a higher data rate (Constant Quality “Q0”), but, for this project and the number of recording media cards I had, the settings I chose to go with were sufficient. When it comes to lenses, I was surprised to see how limited the selection of Canon EF lenses at my disposal was. (I used to have so many more ….) So in order to cover different focal lengths and different shooting scenarios I went with a SIGMA 18-35mm (as alway, a beautiful, fast and sharp lens), a Canon 70-200mm f/4 IS, and a Canon 24mm EF-S f/2.8. Please don’t laugh, this lightweight pancake EF-S lens (modified at the back to fit the camera EF mount), proved to be good enough for handheld filming. The camera cage was from 8Sinn (fits perfectly – check our recent extensive BMPCC 4K Cage Shootout here in case you missed it)! For monitoring the image I used my Zacuto Gratical EVF. As for recording media, I used Angelbird’s AV Pro CF CFast 2.0 cards. Maybe not the cheapest, but very reliable. When it comes to powering the camera, I used a bunch of original Canon E6 batteries and that was just OK. I had enough of those to use and a place to charge when they got empty. Sound was recorded in camera and I’m pleased to say it is very clear and clean. (When using the camera’s internal mics there is some additional noise/hum, but for this mini documentary I used only an external mic for sound. Unfortunately and as you can see, during this project I had no chance to record scenes in low light conditions, but from a quick test I conducted at the office, the camera did surprisingly well! We might revisit lowlight capabilities in later more extensive tests with the camera. During my shoot, lighting conditions kept changing. Not ideal for the film itself but great for the test… Nice to see how the camera and codec are coping with highlights. I also put Katharina (the owner of the riding school) against the open grey sky just in order to that’s indeed possible to stretch the dynamic range quite a bit – there was still lots of detail in the skies after post production. What you can also notice from the video above: at times, I was struggling to keep my subjects in focus. I’m not sure why. Either I’m getting old, or maybe my Zacuto EVF is losing its juvenility, or, 6K is 6K, meaning, no excuses here when you don’t nail focus 100%. Either you are in focus or you are not…. So if I have to summarize my field experience with the camera, I can say it is like driving an electric car. You love many aspects of it yet at the same time must look closely at your mileage at all times (actually, battery levels). In addition, I felt like I should always be aware of the camera’s media consumption when filming in 6K. Both battery consumption and the hunger for storage with this camera need to be properly managed and planned for when shooting with this camera. Not directly related to the camera but important to mention here: it was the first time that I used Nexto DI NPS-10 for backing up some of the material. It is new, very intuitive and working extremely well! A full review will be coming soon.

6K Frame Grab – Click for full resolution 6K image

Editing the footage

You need to be aware that there’s no 6K recording option in ProRes: 6K can be recorded in-camera using Blackmagic RAW exclusively, and 4K can be recorded also in ProRes codecs. I am not sure if it’s technical limitation or if there’s a marketing reason behind it. (“Forcing” people to edit 6K RAW footage in Resolve only?) I don’t know. The data rate might have gotten out of hand with ProRes in 6K though, so we guess that’s the reason behind it. To my knowledge, no other editing platform can currently support Blackmagic RAW, with the exception of Adobe Premiere Pro. Yes, you heard it right, and it is not because of Adobe being so fast in adopting this RAW recording format. There is a way to edit Blackmagic RAW on Premiere, but in order to do so, you will need to use BRAW Studio from Autokroma. Windows and Mac are both supported and I’ve tried it and it is working like a charm! (The best $30 you can spend if you are editing in Premiere).

Conclusion

The Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 6K is a great technical achievement and offers amazing value for money. Don’t forget that you will also get a full two-seat license of DaVinci Resolve Studio 16 with the camera. Yet, is it a camera for me, the independent documentary filmmaker? Here is a real life scenario that I encountered almost a year ago: I’m about to leave to India and shoot a short documentary under our “camera review umbrella” featuring an Indian wedding. At the time, I was able to choose between the (at that time) new Canon EOS R, or the BMPCC 4K. I know that in terms of picture quality the BMPCC 4K will beat the Canon EOS R hands down, but, I also know that as a one-man-band operator I might be struggling capturing the moments I need with the BMPCC 4K. Filming in such a demanding real-world environment is anyway not easy, so dealing with large amount of data/power consumption/focusing issues was not an option for me. And this is what I want to avoid, the hesitation of using a camera because of the possibility of limiting myself on the operational side. I hope my point is clear, and I also hope that Blackmagic Design (under the leadership of their visionary Grant Petty) can move forward by eventually creating a camera that keeps ALL the technical achievements of the BMPCC 6K but, add extended usability to it. In our third part of our BMPCC 6K coverage we will share our technical findings related to the camera’s dynamic range, latitude and rolling shutter effect results with you. Stay tuned. A special thanks to Katharina and Theresa Teschler. More information about their ridding school can be found by clicking here. Music for the above video is courtesy of MusicVine. Get 25% off your next music license with code C5D25 (valid for one use per customer). Color by Lutify.me What do you think about the new BMPCC 6K? Do you have any plans taking a closer look at it? Please share your thoughts with us below. 

Z CAM E2 Cinema Camera in the Wild – Hands-on Review

While planning a trip to the Indian jungle to film a short documentary about Pench National Park, my colleagues at cinema5d challenged me to leave my standard gear at home and take the new cinema camera Z CAM E2 instead – would it be up to the task? Edit: just after completing this review, Z CAM introduced a new firmware update (V 0.88) featuring ZRAW (internal RAW capture, partial debayer, supports up to 4096×2160@30fps initially). We might take a closer look at this ZRAW firmware in the near future.

Z CAM E2 camera

For a while now I have been following the development of micro four thirds cameras. To be specific, I bought my first one exactly 10 years ago, the Panasonic LUMIX GH1. Back then it was hampered by a weak codec (Full HD, AVCHD in 17Mbps) and the max. usable ISO value was 400, but the Voigtlaender lenses gave it the full frame look (e.g. the 25mm f0.95), and the hack of V. Kiselev at a later stage improved the bitrate to a stable 25Mbps. All in all, I loved the images – so much that I never sold it… Fast forward 10 years and I have the new cinema camera Z CAM E2 from the Chinese manufacturer Z CAM in my hands. A micro four thirds camera capable of shooting 4k DCI using a LOG profile (Z-LOG2) recording ProRes HQ 10bit 4:2:2 internally up to 60fps (4k H265 up to 120fps, 160fps in 1:2.4 mode). Wow!

Z CAM E2 – Minimum Rigging

Setting up the Z CAM E2 Cinema Camera for the Trip

What I always liked about the micro four thirds format is the possibility to adapt almost any lens, including the option to use a speed booster (0.71x). The speed booster allows the use of Canon EF glass for example, while at the same time increasing the light sensitivity by one stop. In 4k DCI mode (4096 x 2160) the crop factor of the Z CAM is about 1.9, using the speed booster gives a crop of 1.35 approximately. Unfortunately, we had no cage available for the Z CAM, but the camera has various ¼” mounting points on top, bottom and on the sides. In conjunction with the Z CAM E2 I used an early prototype of the Portkeys BM5 monitor mounted with a magic arm, see the image below (the released version is black, the prototype had an anodized green surface finish). For sound, I took a Sennheiser MKE 440 with me, using the 3.5mm audio input on the Z CAM E2 – mounted to the side, which was not ideal. Also, the recorded sound quality via the 3.5mm input leaves a lot to be desired. I hope Z CAM can improve on the audio part in the future. Lenswise, I opted for two lenses only: the Olympus 12-100mm f4 for the documentary part (it has great image stabilization), and a Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5 – 5.6 version 1 using a Metabones speed booster for the wildlife part. Note that with the 4k DCI settings and 1.9 crop factor vignetting can occur at the widest setting of the Olympus lens. The clever location of the Z CAM E2 battery allows the use of standard Sony NPF batteries with various capacities (and protects the HDMI port at the same time). For my trip I took a few 5200mA (NP F750) ones with me – good news is that power consumption was surprisingly low hence battery life was no issue at all. The same type of battery can be used for the Portkeys BM5 monitor as well which is a big plus, and I needed all the spare batteries for the monitor, as its power consumption was quite high.

Man at work- With the Z CAM E2

Build Quality and the Safari Trip

Temperatures in the Indian jungle would be as high as 45°C, the climate is very dry hence exposing the gear to the bumpy, dusty roads in an open jeep got me a bit nervous. Would the cam and the monitor survive? The answer is yes. I had no issues at all – the build quality of both monitor and camera is top notch, and there was no overheating of both devices. The monitor has a fan which I turned down to the lowest setting to avoid picking up the sound, so it got very very hot. It still worked reliably.

Image Quality of the Z CAM E2 Cinema Camera

Now, this was a major deciding factor for me to take the Z CAM E2 cinema camera on my trip – 4k DCI ProRes HQ in a small but durable package – despite the risk of taking a new, unknown camera with me I just couldn’t say no. And the Z CAM E2 did not disappoint – see the video on top. The camera has a very organic, detailed image with fantastic, out of the box colors. Grading the Z-LOG2 profile using the LUT’s supplied by Z CAM on their homepage was a joy and is as easy as it can get. On the night shots, I had to ramp up the ISO to 16000 – I think the results are still OK and usable.

Dynamic Range

Z CAM claims 13stops of dynamic range on their marketing materials, so I was quite curious how it would fare in our standard test (click here for more info on how we test). Firmware tested was 0.86, raw was not available at that time.

Fig.1: Waveform plot of the Z CAM E2 cinema camera at ISO500 using Z-LOG2 ProRes HQ – about 11 stops can be identified above the noise floor.

The waveform plot of our Xyla 21 stepchart shows about 11 stops (see figure 1). Using IMATEST to calculate the dynamic range I got a result of 10.8 stops at ISO 500, Z-LOG2 using ProRes HQ 4k DCI 23.98fps (at a signal to noise ratio of 2, 11.9 stops for SNR = 1, see figure 2). The Z CAM E2 uses a dual ISO sensor, so I also tested the second gain value of ISO 2500 and got a result of 10.4 stops (SNR = 2). These are very good results for a micro four thirds sensor, almost exactly the same as for the Panasonic GH5s (10.7 stops) and coming in second behind the other four thirds cinema camera rival, the Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 4k, BMPCC4k, which has 11.6 stops of dynamic range in ProRes HQ. The Z CAM E2 also offers an HDR mode, where it captures a second image with an 8 times higher shutter speed for the highlighted part and merges it into one video frame (to increase the dynamic range by additional 3 stops). I have tried this option in practice but quickly abandoned it for moving shots, as the motion blur (or partial lack thereof) of the resulting image looks weird. It may work for a static interview though, or a situation where the scene demands a higher shutter speed (1/200 and up).

Fig. 2:IMATEST calculates 10.8 stops of dynamic range for the Z CAM E2 cinema camera at a signal to noise ratio of 2 for 4k DCI ISO500 ProRes recording using Z-LOG2 (1/SNR = 0.5, medium value in the upper right hand table).

Z CAM Rolling Shutter

We are using a new test method based on a high frequency, quartz & microcontroller based strobe light at 300Hz. As the sensor readout happens from the top to the bottom, we are getting a sequence of black and white bars from the strobe. A quite surprising result on the rolling shutter measurements, which adds up to the very positive overall impression: in 4K DCI 25p mode (using ProRes HQ and ZLOG2) I got a very good result of 11.1[ms]. For comparison, the BMPCC4k has a rolling shutter of 16[ms] in UHD 25p mode.

Z CAM Rolling Shutter effect

 

The Z CAM Universe – the Facebook Group, the app, and the Camera’s Menu

First and foremost the Z CAM facebook group is worth mentioning, the spirit of conversation is very good and people from Z CAM as well as visitors are helpful, including the CEO Kinson Loo who answers questions very often himself. There is also a nice Z CAM smartphone app available for IOS (Android still in a beta release), which connects to the camera’s wifi and allows access / display / change all settings as well as providing a full screen image preview with little latency. In essence, you could use your smartphone instead of a monitor if you accept some lag between the recorded and image view. For the camera part, all the exposure tools (zebra, false color), as well as focus peaking, work very well, although the focus peaking is very strong – I would prefer an option to adjust this in the menu (not available currently). The menu itself is straightforward and well structured, also custom presents for the function buttons are available. However, some of the settings require deeper dives (changing the frame rate for example), hence doing that in the heat of the action does not work so well. One thing to be aware of is the fact, that for ProRes no in-camera playback option is available (firmware version 0.86 at the time of shooting). I hope this changes with a future firmware.

The Z CAM E2 in Conjunction with the Portkeys BM5 Monitor

In theory, this combo should work very well. The Portkeys BM5 monitor (for detailed specs see our article here) is a 5” FHD monitor which allows via a separate cable to display and change settings in the camera’s menu on the touchscreen – on our early prototype this didn’t work though and a newer firmware wasn’t yet available. The screen itself is very bright (2000 NITS), even in direct sunlight I had no issues seeing the image. Unfortunately, the surface of the screen is very reflective which can hamper the viewing experience, see figure 3 below. Also, it gets very very hot and is quite power hungry. I used the “low” setting for the internal fan to avoid picking up the sound on video. All in all, it is a good monitor, but I didn’t like one detail: it only takes 1080p signals via HDMI, although the Z CAM E2 could provide a 4k signal. Hence, you have no good way to judge focus on the monitor itself for a 4k HDMI signal, as neither punching in (1:1 pixel view) nor the in – built focus peaking of the monitor would display this signal accurately. So, you have to rely on the camera’s focus peaking (displayed via HDMI to the monitor).

Fig. 3: The Portkeys BM5 monitor – bright (2000 NITS) and well built, however the screen is very reflective which can hamper the viewing experience outside.

Conclusion

The Z CAM E2 cinema camera is a great new addition to the line of micro four thirds cameras, and got so many things right in the first place – first and foremost the image (audio via the 3.5mm input leaves a lot to be desired though). I love the fact that it allows high frame rates, ProRes recording, and many more things. Z CAM is definitely a company to watch out for – also, I am curious to see their new APS-C and full frame cameras (S6, F6, and F8) that are scheduled to arrive later this year. However, comparing the E2 to other cinema cameras in this sensor class the competitor BMPCC4k cannot be neglected. The BMPCC4k is significantly less expensive, has a large build in screen (5”) and allows internal ProRes as well as 12bit RAW recording (Blackmagic raw). Also, Blackmagic managed to squeeze out 0.8 stops more dynamic range. Hence, as always you have to choose the camera wisely that you need for your particular application, and given the other features of the Z CAM (multi-cam recording & syncing, wifi, etc…) it may be the perfect choice for you!    

BMPCC 6K vs. BMPCC 4K – Which one is for you?

The new Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 6K has landed. It offers (up to) 6K resolution, a Super 35 sensor, and a Canon EF mount. Aside from those changes, what are the main differences (or similarities) between this one and the older Pocket Cinema 4K? In case you are already a proud owner of the 4K version, will it make sense to upgrade? In the above video and in this article I’ve tried to answer this question. 

BMPCC 6K (Left) VS BMPCC 4K (Right)

Blackmagic Design, the company who engraved on its flag to cater us, the filmmakers, with high quality “on the budget” tools for filming/editing and postproduction, has done it again by delivering a camera that obviously managed to stir our swamp. Personally, in all my cinema5D years, I haven’t seen such a phenomenon where people endorse a camera so fast. Probably Blackmagic Design did something right. Apparently, when it comes to “value for money”, people are more forgiving when some (important) features are missing. But for now, let’s leave usability aside as this is not the essence of this article.

8Sinn cage. Perfect fit

Stay Tune – Three Parts Continues Coverage

As this camera proved to be of great interest for many, we’ve decided to dedicate the extra time to review it inside out. Here in part one, I’m talking about how the new camera compares to the older BMPCC 4K. The second part, which I took the new BMPCC 6K for a short spin and shot a short documentary with it, will see the day of light early next week.  The third part is a bit more technical. Gunther, my colleague, will conduct aDynamic Range, Latitude and Rolling shutter tests during next week. Of course, we will share our results with you guys as soon as we have them ready.

EF Mount VS Micro Forth Third Mount

BMPCC 6K vs. BMPCC 4K – The Differences

6K Resolution: Let me start from the obvious… Unlike its 4K brother (or is it sister?), the new 6K camera can be used for filming in up to 6K resolution in different frame rates. The nice thing is, that even when filming in the highest resolution and codec, a fast SD card can still be used for convenient internal recording. (BM RAW 3:1, 6144 x 3456. We heartily recommend using Angelbird V90 cards. They are fast and reliable). Mind you that this will work when filming in 24/25p. If your wish is to film in 50/60p, CFast 2.0 cards will become your best friend. Both cards options are rather limited when it comes to capacity, so a feasible solution will be to use an external SSD. Again, I can recommend using Angelbird as I’m yet to be disappointed with their media quality or, customer service. (Wish the same could have been said about Lexar. What a horrible customer service experience. NEVER again!). By the way, speaking of resolution, mind you that recording in 6K is available in Blackmagic RAW codec only. (4K can be recorded in ProRes). I guess Blackmagic design wanting people to convert and use their DaVinci resolve platform for the purpose of editing. S35 sensor: Unlike its sister (or is it brother?), the sensor inside this camera is larger than the one found inside its 4K sibling. (Super 35 vs. Micro Four Third). In fact, it is a little bit smaller than other S35 sensors, especially those made by Canon, but who are we be too so picky… In general, the advantages of having a larger sensor are a wider field of view, easily manipulating depth of filed and, depending on the sensor pixel count (and pixels size), better lowlight capability. Active Canon EF Mount: BMPCC 4K has a Micro Four Third lens mount. The new BMPCC 6K is now equipped with an EF lens mount. It’s absolutely legit to ask if Blackmagic did the right choice here, but in all honesty, I do understand why they went this way. The good thing, it’s time to air brush some dusty EF mount lenses. I thought I’ll never use them again… The less good thing, any other modern mount could have taken this camera to a different level when it comes to lens usage flexibility (shorter flange, bigger chance for adaptivity). In a way, that’s where the older BMPCC 4K shines. The MFT mount is very adaptable. Throw a Metabones Speed Booster EF to MFT ULTRA  0.71X on it and bang, your field of view becomes wider (even more than the one found in the new camera), and on top, you gain one stop of light. As a result of using the EF mount on the new BMPCC 6K camera, NOT all cages suited to the 4K model will fit. We can confirm that 8Sin and SmallRig cages will. In regards to Tilta’s cage, “as is”, the cage WILL NOT fit. With a little adjustment that forces one to move the front nose part (“Tilta’s logo”) and the very small rubber band under it, it will fit, BUT it will also be VERY tight and can cause some scratches to the camera body itself. Photo capabilities:  Up to 21.2MP still image capture. This is an improvement over the 8MP the BMPCC 4K offered. Will test this feature when in the field. Price:  BMPCC 6K is $2,495 and the BMPCC 4K is $1,295. No doubt that both camera prices are fair, yet, it is a difference that should be mentioned.

Same Inputs and Outputs

BMPCC 6K vs. BMPCC 4K – The Similarities

Where to start. Both cameras share so much together. Excellent OS (The best in the industry to my taste), color science, 1920 x 1080 touchscreen 5″ LCD, buttons layout, general camera body structure (but the upper EF mount and lower ventilation ribs). Inputs/outputs, power options. Even the battery life is almost the same. The advantage goes to the new 6K camera as it was running about 6 minutes longer… (Yehhh). When it comes to autofocus performance, both cameras showed inconsistency, so each did a bit better on a different round (long story short, both behaved the same). Weight-wise, the BMCC 6K is 168g heavier. I guess I can live with this… When it comes to low light, I’ll try and take a closer look, but for now, it looks as if both are performing in a similar way. Dual native ISO values are the same, the cleanest image should be obtained when using ISO 400 and ISO 3200. Last but not least, even the rolling shutter effect seems to be visually similar. As I wrote before, we will test and come up with a number soon.

BMPCC 6K

Conclusion:

Both, the old BMPCC 4K and new BMPCC 6K are very efficient filming devices. At the end of the day, it really depends on your needs and budget. I guess if I was a BMPCC 4K owner, I wouldn’t rush to replace my camera, while if I was in the market for purchasing a new capable device, the BMPCC 6K would certainly be a candidate to capture the top of my list.